|Geoindicators | GEOIN | Publications | Events | Links|
|Applying geoindicators | Checklist | Image gallery | Scientific Contributors | Contact Us|
|home | back | all documents||mail to friend | printer friendly version|
NAME: Shoreline position
BRIEF DESCRIPTION: The position of the shoreline along ocean coasts and around inland waters (lakes) varies over a broad spectrum of time scales in response to shoreline erosion (retreat) or accretion (advance), changes in water level, and land uplift or subsidence [see relative sea level; surface displacement]. Long-term trends in shoreline position may be masked in the short term by variations over periods of 0.1-10 years or more, related, for example, to individual storms, changes in storminess, and El Niñ o/Southern Oscillation effects. Shoreline position reflects the coastal sediment budget, and changes may indicate natural or human-induced effects alongshore or in nearby river catchments. The detailed shape and sedimentary character of a beach (e.g. beach slope, cusp dimensions, bar position and morphology, barrier crest and berm elevation, sediment size and shape) are highly sensitive to oceanographic forcing, including deep-water wave energy, nearshore wave transformation, wave setup, storm surge, tides, and nearshore circulation: morphodynamic adjustments and feedbacks are common. Qualitative assessments of shoreline morphology can be used as a proxy for shore-zone processes, partially substituting for more quantitative measures of shoreline change where these are not available.
SIGNIFICANCE: Changes in the position of the shoreline affect transportation routes, coastal installations, communities, and ecosystems. The effects of shoreline erosion on coastal communities and structures can be drastic and costly. It is of paramount importance for coastal settlements to know if local shorelines are advancing, retreating or stable. Rates of recession as high as 5- 10 m/yr have been measured in many places around the world, and much higher rates have been recorded locally. Coastal erosion in the USA alone is estimated to cost $700 million annually. Floods related to recent storm surges along the low- lying coasts of the Bay of Bengal have caused as many as 50,000 deaths per event.
HUMAN OR NATURAL CAUSE: Erosion and sediment accretion are on- going natural processes along all coasts. Human activities (e.g. dredging, beach mining, river modification, installation of protective structures such as breakwaters, removal of backshore vegetation, reclamation of nearshore areas) can profoundly alter shoreline processes, position and morphology, in particular by affecting the sediment supply.
ENVIRONMENT WHERE APPLICABLE: Ocean coasts, lake shores, estuaries.
TYPES OF MONITORING SITES: Cliffs, beaches, coastal dunes and wetlands [see dune formation and reactivation; wetlands extent, structure and hydrology] and other shoreline settings.
SPATIAL SCALE: patch to landscape / mesoscale to regional
METHOD OF MEASUREMENT:
QUANTITATIVE: Using conventional ground survey and other methods (simple rod and tape profiles, levelling, electronic total-station surveys, airphotos, GPS, analysis of old maps and charts), the following parameters are commonly monitored:
QUALITATIVE: Simple and immediate visual assessments of shore morphology can indicate the state of the shoreline (eroding/accreting). These should be supplemented by photographs and videos taken from low-flying aircraft, of the mean or high water line, the limit of vegetation, the landward limit of washover sedimentation, or the base or top of a coastal cliff. Simple monitoring can be done by repeated assessments of change along a particular stretch of shoreline, such as an increase in the degree of erosion at individual sites or an increase in the number of eroding sites in a particular region.
FREQUENCY OF MEASUREMENT: Seasonal, before and after storms. Semi-annual or annual, once seasonal variability is established.
LIMITATIONS OF DATA AND MONITORING: Results are site specific, temporally and spatially discontinuous, and of varying quality. Historical records are commonly short. Qualitative results can be misleading, and many methods have severe limitations. Sediment budget calculations are hampered by lack of accurate data on coastal bathymetry and topography; map analysis by lack of accurate maps and reliable datum levels; photo analysis by radial distortion and tilt and by difficulties in determining high- water lines.
Adjacent shoreline segments may respond differently to the same environmental conditions. Gravel- dominated coastal systems may exhibit progressive beach crest growth and sediment sorting that can lead to increased stability with time or to a growing potential for rapid destabilization during extreme events. Changes in relative sea level and in sediment supply are critical factors in coastal evolution and in the response of shorelines to environmental change. In some cases sediment supply may be controlled by processes external to the coastal system, such as glacier- burst floods, changes in ice- marginal drainage, or artificial river impoundment.
APPLICATIONS TO PAST AND FUTURE: In general, coastal phenomena can be reliably anticipated only where extensive research and monitoring data exist. A lack of current change is no assurance of continued stability in the future, but information on changes in the shoreline position, especially over the longer term, may be useful for short-term empirical predictions. Monitoring shorelines and coastal sediment dynamics may provide a better understanding of the responses of the shoreline to human modifications and sea-level change.
POSSIBLE THRESHOLDS: Subtle changes in sediment supply or other factors can shift the balance between shoreline stability or accretion and shoreline erosion, with significant implications for coastal ecosystems and settlements.
Berger, A.R. & W.J.Iams (eds)1996. Geoindicators: Assessing rapid environmental changes in earth systems. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema. (see papers by Forbes & Liverman, Morton, and Young et al.).
Carter, R.W.G. 1988. Coastal environments: an introduction to the physical, ecological and cultural systems of coastlines. London: Academic Press.
Carter, R.W.G. & C.D.Woodroffe (eds) 1994. Coastal evolution: Late Quaternary shoreline morphodynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (especially paper by Cowell and Thom on coastal morphodynamics).
Godschalk, D.R., D.J.Brower & T.Beatley 1989. Catastrophic coastal storms and hazard mitigation and development management. Raleigh NC: Duke University Press.
Pilkey, O.H., R.A.Morton, J.T.Kelley & S.Penland 1989. Coastal land loss. Washington, American Geophysical Union.
OTHER SOURCES OF INFORMATION: Coastal, environment, oceanography agencies, geological surveys, IGA, IGCP (Project 367 -Late Quaternary coastal records of rapid change) , INQUA, SCOR.
RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOLOGICAL ISSUES: Changes in the shoreline affect the distribution and functioning of salt marsh, estuarine and littoral ecosystems, as well as the planning and management of coastal resources and built structures.
OVERALL ASSESSMENT: The shoreline position is perhaps the most important geoindicator for low-lying coastal communities and islands. Quantitative methods are best for predicting future shoreline movements. Qualitative indicators of shoreline position and morphology are practical, inexpensive, and rapid guides to coastal erosion.
|© Geoindicators Initiative GEOIN|